While I don’t believe all discourse
analysis is inherently political and critical as Gee suggests, I do believe that
often is the case. The 3 readings reminded
me of a topic being discussed in another of my classes whereas education, in
its origins in this country, is a means of control. Although it has evolved into a much larger
and critical portion of today’s society education still is a somewhat
deceivingly efficient method of dominance; Training individuals to be seemingly
knowledgeable, productive, morally sound, law abiding citizens while securing
the classes’ unbalanced state with little to no growth or upward mobility. The elite create an ideology promoted by the
intellectuals for all to follow through education, having teaching individuals
to confirm to a limited cultural model.
In Language, the narrator talks
about the idea of “the oppressors’ language” in relation to various ethnic
groups but mainly focusing on blacks here in the United States. Black Africans, being displaced, took bits
and parts of the English language creating their own form of the English
language in order to communicate and progress.
Similar to how the British viewed American English as a bastardized form
of their language, so did the well educated Americans when viewing the southern
black vernacular. When submitted in use
in critical essays, editors would correct it according to Standard English
claiming it needed to reach a more inclusive audience. Gee spoke of two principles that serve as the
basis of ethical human communication and interaction, the second being of
people having a moral obligation to change a cultural model into a primary
theory when there is reason to believe that the cultural model advantages
oneself or one’s group over other people or other groups. The rejection of the usage of the southern
black vernacular in works of literature as a means of introducing another
cultural model to me is a clear example of long standing political views.
Although my primary language is
English and British English at that, my recent experience in Brazil as well my
experiences immigrating to New York as well as growing up in Corona, Queens
allowed me a find a better connection with the stories told in Eleanor Klutz’s
Outsider to Insider”. I moved to New
York when I was 9 and it was a bit of a culture shock adapting most everything
I learned as being ‘right’ to what was ‘a better way’ as a classmate told me
and basically trying to fit in speaking as ‘proper’ as I did. Living in a Mexican and Dominican dominate
area of Queens where most of my friends spoke Spanish was another experience. Hearing them converse and Spanish and or Spanglish
and usually not understand what was being said around me. When spoken to in English, at times I did not
understanding the meaning/context of some of the words and the slang spoken
being that most because I recently moved to the country. While that didn’t entirely compares to the
experience of Quy, Abby or Sophia, my trip to Brazil gave me such an
understanding as to what it’s like to feel like an outsider. While in Brazil I had the opportunity to take
martial arts classes. While acquiring the
movement patterns was as difficult as in any other setting, trying to
understand and analyze the instructions and corrections was at times discouraging. I often didn’t want to speak or would only
speak in response to a question. I was
determined to get through each class and learn as much of the language and the
skills I could but it was a factor I had to deal with but I was able to work
through it positively; I’m used to throwing myself “into the fire”. I felt the more I learned in those classes,
the better I would be mentally, physically and definitely verbally far as being
able to converse in somewhat complete sentences and not just fragments.
I felt Gee’s analysis on the theory
was well explained especially highlighting the impact the cultural models we hold
have. I thought of the good 4 Agreements,
namely the first agreement ‘be impeccable with your word’. Words all have a story attached to them and
it’s important to know that story to actually understand the word. That story as a variety of influences that
are internal, external, conscious and unconscious and even in the same cultural
model will vary vastly from person to person.
With that in mind many of those same sources, the people and things that
influence the story, are often influenced by those well aware of the power of a
word and use their model as the basis when establishing societies; A dominant
cultural model helps maintains social order on a larger scale.
Language and the use of the language
is a powerful tool.
I agree with you and the authors regarding the power of language and the connection it has with society as a whole. You bring up the authors' points regarding the ability for language to create a hegemonic structure of one culture dominating over the other. However, what do you mean by "a dominant cultural model helps maintains social order on a larger scale."? While having one standard way to speak and write a language has its advantages, doesn't the dominance of a cultural model foster oppression and systematic violence over a marginalized group of people?
ReplyDeleteI should have been stronger and more clear with my intention of that line but your assessment is what i was attempting to state at the end, as well as throughout my response. Thanks for reading.
ReplyDelete